02 February 2009

Wallowing in ignorance

Excerpts from "A Quibble," an essay by Mark Slouka in the Notebook section of the February 2009 issue of Harper's Magazine.
We have every reason to be pleased with ourselves. Bucking all recent precedent, we seem to have put a self-possessed, intelligent man in the White House...It would be churlish to quibble. Still, let’s... I’d like to believe that we’re a different people now; that we’re more educated, more skeptical, more tough-minded than we were... but it’s hard work; actual human beings keep getting in the way...

What we need to talk about... is our ever-deepening ignorance (of politics, of foreign languages, of history, of science, of current affairs, of pretty much everything) and not just our ignorance but our complacency in the face of it, our growing fondness for it... We’re deeply loyal to it. Ignorance gives us a sense of community; it confers citizenship; our representatives either share it or bow down to it or risk our wrath.

Wherever it may have resided before, the brain in America has migrated... as far as the gut—where it has come to a stop. The gut tells us things. It tells us what’s right and what’s wrong, who to hate and what to believe and who to vote for. Increasingly, it’s where American politics is done. All we have to do is listen to it and the answer appears in the little window of the eight ball: “Don’t trust him. Don’t know. Undecided. Just because, that’s why.” We know because we feel, as if truth were a matter of personal taste, or something to be divined in the human heart, like love...

I don’t believe I have the right to an opinion about something I know nothing about—constitutional law, for example, or sailing—a notion that puts me sadly out of step with a growing majority of my countrymen, many of whom may be unable to tell you anything at all about Islam, say, or socialism, or climate change, except that they hate it, are against it, don’t believe in it...

The average German or Czech, though possibly no less ignorant than his American counterpart, will probably consider the possibility that someone who has spent his life studying something may have an opinion worth considering. Not the American. Although perfectly willing to recognize expertise in basketball, for example, or refrigerator repair, when it comes to the realm of ideas, all folks (and their opinions) are suddenly equal...

If nothing else, the fact that so many have convinced themselves that one man, thus far almost entirely untested, will slay the culture of corruption with one hand while pulling us out of the greatest mess we’ve known in a century with the other suggests that a certain kind of “clap your hands if you believe” naiveté crosses the aisle at will.

...it comes down to the unpleasant fact that a significant number of our fellow citizens are now as greedy and gullible as a boxful of puppies; they’ll believe anything; they’ll attack the empty glove; they’ll follow that plastic bone right off the cliff. Nothing about this election has changed that fact. If they’re ever activated—if the wrong individual gets to them, in other words, before the educational system does—we may live to experience a tyranny of the majority Tocqueville never imagined.
(The full essay is available here.)

2 comments:

  1. Hey Stan, the link you provided is being halted by Harper's, which wants us to buy a subscription to their magazine to read it.

    The article was fascinating, quite accurate, though it did make me feel a bit self-conscious. As a blogger, I frequently present an opinion based on information I find and research, and have even been accused of ignorance before. I've (GASP) even made mistakes.

    But the truth is that some of us DO try to spend some time researching and getting facts before we just randomly spout out at the mouth. Your blog is a prime example of someone who checks and researches things before forming an opinion.

    Since I wasn't able to read the rest of the essay, I wonder where it went...

    ReplyDelete
  2. I've been a subscriber to the print edition of Harper's since time immemorial, and frankly didn't realize that the archives are not accessible to the general public. Other magazines (including I think the Atlantic) open up their online versions to everyone.

    One way to find the original text (which often works for me searching other primary material) is to Google a couple of the unique terms (in this case "slouka" works well in that regard, then add "quibble") to see other citations on the web.

    I just did that now, and found several citations and discussions of the editorial, some of which backlink to the original archive, but others may have fulltext reprints at more accessible sites.

    The other resource for you would be your local library. The editorial I cited was from the February 2009, which is the most recent issue.

    ReplyDelete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...